The phrase bucket list is older than most people think, but only by about three years. It enters the English-language corpus in noticeable volume in 2007, the year Rob Reiner directed Jack Nicholson and Morgan Freeman in a film of that name. Two terminally ill men, an oil tycoon and a mechanic, escape their oncology ward and go skydiving, race Mustangs at the Shelby track, visit the Taj Mahal, and ride motorcycles on the Great Wall of China. The film grossed $175 million. The phrase entered every language that imports from American English. Within a year the term was on greeting cards.
What had been, until then, a private and largely unspoken accounting of last wishes became a marketed category. Travel companies began selling bucket list trips. Magazines published 100 things to do before you die lists. Skydiving operators tripled their over-50 customer base in the United States between 2007 and 2012.
The bucket list, as it exists in 2026, is not a philosophy of finitude. It is marketing. And it is, in a way the people writing the lists almost never notice, somebody else’s idea of what their life should have meant.
Where it comes from
The screenplay was written by Justin Zackham, who at the time was a young writer in Los Angeles who had himself made a list of things to do before he died and called it, in his journal, his bucket list. The metaphor is from the idiom to kick the bucket, English slang for dying since at least 1785. Zackham’s list included things like get a movie made. The movie that got made was The Bucket List. The metaphor recursed.
Zackham’s private list is interesting because it is exactly the kind of list most people would make: a mixture of professional ambition, social validation, and a couple of bodily thrills. Nothing in it is private in any deep sense. It is the list of someone who has not yet read Bronnie Ware.
The film, then, took the structure of one young writer’s ambition and projected it onto two dying men, where it functioned as fantasy rather than autobiography. The two men do things that almost no actual dying person does, for reasons almost no actual dying person has, validated by a friendship that almost no actual dying person forms in their final months. The film is well-made and emotionally efficient. It is also, as a guide to dying, an artifact.
That is what most readers now use as the template. A 2007 screenplay by a 36-year-old in Los Angeles.
What it gets wrong
The bucket list is structurally externally-validated. This is the first thing wrong with it. Notice that almost no one’s bucket list includes reread Middlemarch slowly, or make the same pot of stew my grandmother made until I get it right, or spend a full day with my brother saying nothing. These items would not survive being read aloud at a dinner party. They are not list-able in the social sense. The list, as a form, demands items that can be photographed, posted, narrated.
This means the bucket list is biased toward what Bernard Williams, in his 1973 essay on the Makropulos case, called conditional desires. A conditional desire is something you want if you are alive, but which does not, in itself, give you a reason to remain alive. You would like to see the Taj Mahal someday, if you happen to be in Agra. You would not, in the way Williams uses the term, have a categorical desire for it — a desire so woven into your continuing self that you would feel its absence as a wound.
Williams’s categorical desires are the small, particular, often unphotographable ones. The argument you keep meaning to have with your father before he gets too tired to have it. The novel you keep meaning to finish. The relationship you keep meaning to mend. The hour you keep meaning to spend, undistracted, with the person you have been married to for sixteen years.
The bucket list, almost without exception, lists conditional desires and ignores categorical ones. That is its first failure. It mistakes novelty for depth.
The second failure follows from the first. The list, in promising a grand finale, licenses the postponement of actual life. The ten items on the list become an alibi. You are not living in default mode for the next twenty-three years, you tell yourself; you are saving up for the Patagonia hike and the truffle hunt in Alba. The list is a deferral mechanism dressed as an aspiration. It is the same psychological move as I’ll start writing the novel after I retire, with the same expected outcome.
What the dying actually regret
Bronnie Ware was a palliative care nurse in Australia. Between 2003 and 2010 she sat with dying patients, mostly in their last twelve weeks, and listened. In 2012 she published The Top Five Regrets of the Dying. The list:
- I wish I’d had the courage to live a life true to myself, not the life others expected of me.
- I wish I hadn’t worked so hard.
- I wish I’d had the courage to express my feelings.
- I wish I’d stayed in touch with my friends.
- I wish I’d let myself be happier.
Three of the five are about relationships. None are about money. None — and this is the part the bucket-list industry does not advertise — are about the bucket list.
Nobody, in the data Ware collected, lay dying and regretted not having gone hot-air ballooning over Cappadocia. Nobody regretted not having seen the northern lights. Nobody regretted not having eaten at Noma. The novelty-craving items, which dominate every bucket list ever published in Travel + Leisure, are entirely absent from the actual regret literature.
Atul Gawande, in Being Mortal (2014), confirms the same pattern from a different angle. The dying do not, in the main, want experiences they have not had. They want more of the experiences they have already had, with the people they have already loved, in the rooms they already know. They want their granddaughter to come over again. They want one more dinner with the friend they fell out of touch with in 2009. They want their wife to read aloud to them. They want, in Williams’s terms, more of what they already categorically wanted, not a curated list of what they conditionally never got around to.
The hospice literature is the negative photograph of the bucket-list industry. They show, side by side, exactly opposite values.
It is worth pausing on why this disconnect exists, because it is not an accident. The bucket list is written by the version of you that has time, energy, and the cognitive surplus to imagine adventures. The regret is voiced by the version of you that has none of those things, and that has, in the long absence of the things that actually mattered, finally noticed which were which. The two lists are produced by two different selves, and one of them — the one in the hospice bed — has information the other cannot access until it is too late to use it. Ware’s contribution, and Gawande’s, is to smuggle that information backward.
The further point: the bucket list is, in nearly every case, a list of things the writer believes they would not be able to do now. The Iceland trip is deferred because of work. The novel is deferred because of the children. The relationships are deferred because of fatigue. The list is a record of postponement disguised as a record of ambition. The dying see it for what it was. The living, mostly, do not.
An honest list
What does an honest list of last things look like? It looks small. It looks particular. It looks, when you read it aloud, embarrassing — because the things on it are not the things you would have wanted other people to see you wanting.
Lena is 42, a software engineer in Seattle, $310k saved, single, no children. Her bucket list, written when she was 28 in the back of a planner, contained: climb Kilimanjaro, see the pyramids, visit Iceland, attend Burning Man, eat at El Bulli, learn Italian, take a year off in Tuscany. El Bulli closed in 2011. Burning Man she went to twice, didn’t enjoy it, kept that quiet. The rest she has not done.
Her honest list, audited last month, contains seven items:
- Spend a full week with my mother before she stops recognizing me.
- Reread the four novels I read in my twenties that mattered, in order, slowly.
- Learn to make my grandmother’s lentil stew so I can stop missing it.
- Finish the letters to my brother that I have started three times.
- Sit through one full cherry blossom season in the park near the apartment, every day.
- Sleep, for one year, more than seven hours a night.
- Have the conversation with my father I have been not having since 2018.
Notice the absence of altitude, transit, and Instagram. Notice that none of these items would survive being announced at a dinner party. Notice that all seven could be completed for under $4,000 and inside eighteen months, which means none of them are blocked by the FIRE math. They are blocked by the deferral the FIRE math underwrites.
This is what an honest list looks like for most readers. Small, particular, repeatable, embarrassing to say aloud. The fact that you would not put any of these items on a bucket list is the strongest evidence that the bucket list as a form is broken.
The category is the error
The bucket list, considered as a category, is a way of postponing actual life into a future grand finale that will not, when it arrives, satisfy. It promises that the conditional desires accumulated over a working life will, given enough money and enough vacation days, eventually consummate into meaning. They will not. The hospice nurses know this. The dying know this. The screenplay writers in Los Angeles do not yet know this, because they have not yet sat with anyone for their last twelve weeks.
The move available to you, at 42 or 55 or whatever you are reading this at, is to recognize that the list is not the problem. The category is. Throw out the list. Make a smaller one, in your own handwriting, of the things you would actually miss having done — not the things that would photograph well.
Then start the first one today. Not next year. Not after the FIRE number. Today.
The dying do not regret a missing trip to Iceland. They regret the call they kept meaning to make.
Leave a Reply